It's my hope that a gradual effort to place wires underground will reduce the number of outages and the length of outages during future storms. During Hurricane Sandy half of Greenburgh residents were out of power--some for up to two weeks.
This initiative, along with other proactive measures being taken by the town, Con Ed, and state/county emergency planners, is a step in the right direction. I am reaching out to our federal representatives and will ask that they consider a federal stimulus program -- helping to fund efforts to place wires underground when local governments are doing major road, pipe repairs.
PAUL FEINER
http://westchester.news12.com/news/con-ed-to-bury-power-lines-in-new-york-city-westchester-to-prevent-power-outages-during-storms-1.5364088
For Con Ed, It May Be Time to Go Underground
By JOSEPH BERGER
Published: September 24, 2006
But the charm of a plague of darkness like the kind
that struck Westchester three times this summer wears thin in today's
ultra-wired universe. The children want to watch a DVD rather than turn the
pages of a book or play gin rummy. They don't even know what gin rummy is.
Husbands and wives need to check their e-mail 24/7, even on lazy holiday
weekends. Cellphones and iPods need to be recharged. Trader Joe's frozen jasmine
rice goes bad when the refrigerator dies.
The power failures that Westchester had -- from
Ernesto on Labor Day weekend, a tornado and lesser windstorm in July and
powerful storms earlier in the year -- were not the kind of encompassing grid
failures that blacked out New York City in 1965, 1977 and 2003. Lights then were
restored in a day or two.
But with Ernesto blowing down 1,300 trees and weekend
utility crews spread exceedingly thin, whole neighborhoods had to cope without
electricity for five or six days. The romance faded very quickly.
The supervisor of Greenburgh, Paul J. Feiner, who
compared the ineffective response with that of a Third World country, has asked
the utility to explore the merits of gradually burying power lines underground,
where they won't be a subject to the whims of weather. He suggested that
overhead lines might be as outdated as rotary-dial phones.
''People have no confidence the power is going to stay
on,'' he said. ''I've had constituents who had five, six and seven outages this
year alone.''
Mr. Feiner comes up with proposals as often as Mickey
Rooney once did, though his are not aimed at prospective brides. But this time
he may be right: burying cables may be an idea whose time has come. The suburbs
have matured from quaint bedroom communities to places where one-third of
Americans live. In 1950, just before Con Edison took over county power,
Westchester had 625,000 people, or 1,445 per square mile. It now has 923,459, or
2,134 per square mile. While it once had 25,000 acres of farmland, it is down to
9,900, mostly plant nurseries enabling suburbanites to adorn backyards.
Americans live far differently than they did in the
1950's or even the 90's. More work out of their homes because they can, as long
as computers and fax machines keep working. Children raised on Super Mario
Brothers cannot spend four days by flashlight.
William J. McGrath, Con Edison's vice president for
the Bronx and Westchester electric operations, marshals some compelling
arguments for keeping the present system. It costs $100,000 a mile to string a
line overhead, but $1 million to bury it, which would mean $5 billion for the
entire county. Those figures don't include the costs of repeatedly restringing
lines after storms, but Mr. McGrath said repairs on underground cables, though
less frequent, are much more expensive and take much longer than lifting workers
to the top of a pole in a bucket truck.
Con Edison, he said, runs underground cable in
downtowns like White Plains and Yonkers where the density of population and the
density of cables required justify the costs. But homeowners in more spread-out
villages, he argued, would not want to see their bills raised to pay for burying
cables, including the $2,000 to $10,000 per home for new metering equipment.
But what Con Edison doesn't seem to factor in is the
cost of lost days of work, spoiled food, hotels for orphans of the storm -- and
shattered equanimity. If predictions of global warming and its consequences are
to be trusted, Westchester residents can expect more seasons of fierce storms
and hair-pulling disruptions -- true inconveniences, not just inconvenient
truths.
Yes, less well-to-do homeowners will recoil at the
cost of submerging power lines, but discussion can begin with state and local
governments about ways to have wealthier homeowners pick up more of the tab,
perhaps by tying the bill for construction to the assessed value of houses. The
state can also provide subsidies.
Chris Olert, a Con Ed spokesman, said the company
would soon evaluate its performance, as it does after every big storm. One
question that should be studied is why there were not more crews on call for the
Labor Day weekend. But readiness is a management problem; the bigger issue is
where power lines should be. Many frustrated county residents are saying that
gradually burying them in more teeming suburban areas -- over dozens of years so
the bills don't pinch -- should be at the top of the agenda.