Thursday, April 03, 2008

TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE COMMENTARY

I received this interesting commentary about the TZ bridge from George Sherman and Sher Chorost. PAUL FEINER
To paraphrase an old saying, those who don’t learn from the past are doomed to repeat their mistakes in the future.
When the lower level of the George Washington Bridge was built, it was intended for rail which never materialized. Instead, it became a conduit for an enormous increase in car and truck traffic. Could this happen to the Tappan Zee Bridge?
We expressed fears almost 8 years ago that this scenario was a possibility. We felt that the N.Y. State Thruway Authority could build a larger bridge financed by bonds and/or increased tolls. However, ridership projections then, did not rise to a level where needed federal dollars for rail transit would be available because of competition from other higher profile projects. Our great concern was that we could end up with a larger bridge with additional lanes that would be used for autos and trucks..
Up to now, the transportation and the construction components of this project were linked, thus providing some assurance that there would be a transit commitment on a larger bridge. Now with these two elements of the TZ project separated, the Department of Transportation has positioned itself to repeat the G.W. Bridge story.
In addition, we continuously asked during this period; where was the money coming from? There was no answer then and there is no answer today. The problem of money now is more critical than ever as the State and the Federal governments are financially strapped. The chief financial officer of N.Y., Thomas DiNapoli, has said that he doesn’t feel that the State can afford to build a new bridge. He has indicated that our debt is too high, and it is compounded by declining revenues. The funds are simply not there.
The same can be said of the Federal government. The value of the dollar is declining; our deficit is growing exponentially as we borrow for the war and interest on these loans continues to escalate. Because of these economic realities, it is highly unlikely that we will get much help from the Feds. Even if there were dollars available, they most likely will go to transportation projects where ridership projections exceed those of this corridor, i.e. the Second Avenue subway and the L.I.R.R. connection to Manhattan’s east side. We have written about these issues for years. These arguments may sound repetitious but they deserve to be repeated, until those responsible for making the final decisions start addressing them realistically.
Another critical area is our air quality and the effect that it has on our lives. Our region has been out of compliance with
clean air standards for years, and it would behoove us to examine the impact that it has had on our health.
Studies conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency show that particulate matter, air pollution, increased levels of ozone which has proven to be a consistent predictor of increased death rates and respiratory distress. More than three-quarters of the ozone pollution that we breathe comes from the tailpipes of cars and trucks. Are we adequately dealing with this acknowledged contributor to lung disease, the number three killer in the U.S.? Our children, the elderly, and those individuals who suffer from asthma and chronic heart and respiratory disorders are the most vulnerable. Asthma has quickly become the most prevalent chronic disorder affecting children under 17 years of age. How is our state government dealing with this problem? Where is the public information that we need to protect our health, and how do they plan to mitigate a potential (if not existing) health crisis before our area suffers the same fate as the South Bronx? These critical health-related questions are simply not being adequately addressed. Instead, we are on a path to increased auto and truck traffic via a substantially larger bridge and a wider highway.
No consideration has been given to alleviate traffic flow in the TZ area by building another bridge or expanding the existing bridges north of Rockland where the major growth is expected. Current plans call for all anticipated, additional auto and truck traffic to be sent through this overburdened, overdeveloped and overpolluted area. Even tunnels that could provide our best opportunity to control air pollution, have been removed from consideration for questionable reasons.
Where oh where has rational and regional thinking gone? And where is the outrage from Rockland and Westchester counties? We should be flooding the Department of Transportation, our county officials and our congressional representatives with letters, e-mails and faxes, demanding answers to these questions. To contact the D.O.T.:
Michael Anderson, Project Director
660 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, NY 10591
Fax:914-358-0621 E-mail: tzbsite@dot.state.ny.us
………………………………………………………………
George Sherman, President, Rockland Branch,
Sherwood Chorost, President, Westchester Branch
E-mail: CCRDrockwest@aol.com
“Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
What we need is a tunnel or a new bridge going through Taxter Ridge PARK.

Anonymous said...

dumb or dumber?

Anonymous said...

This park cannot be used by anyone or for anything but landfill.
The state can use it to help with the overflow traffic on the bridge.
They say we need a new bridge why
not use this property.
Since the county and state pay their share of the ripoff,why not put it to good use for all the people to use who travel every day on this bridge that constantly needs repairs.
In the newspaper someone suggested a tunnel so this too will be a good place for entrance and exit .

Anonymous said...

This park cannot be used by anyone or for anything but landfill.
The state can use it to help with the overflow traffic on the bridge.
They say we need a new bridge why
not use this property.
Since the county and state pay their share of the ripoff,why not put it to good use for all the people to use who travel every day on this bridge that constantly needs repairs.
In the newspaper someone suggested a tunnel so this too will be a good place for entrance and exit .

Anonymous said...

What a stupid suggestion!

Anonymous said...

Many ideas that someone said that they were stupid were put into action.
You may think one way but some state officials are thinking in the same vein.Tunnel or new bridge.
Stupid or not you never know what is lurking in the planners minds.

Anonymous said...

The DOT is toying with the many lives that use this bridge every day.
If they need a new bridge go for it why wait for a big disaster to happen.
They put more and more tax money into the projects of over hawling what has been fractured through out the years.
Do what has to be done once and for all.
We need as new bridge so be it.
We need a tunnel that's alright too.
How many people must die before you make up your minds as to which way to go?
The safety of the riders should come first but it seems that this is the least of your concerns.
You are more concerned as to what the people in the neighboring areas will have to say than safety.
You are using our tax money for all your projects why should this one be different.
Give us what is needed to make our daily commute across the river safe
either by a new bridge or a tunnel.