Thursday, May 21, 2009

Greenburgh unemployment levels

Location Year Month Jobless rate Employed Change in employment, past year % change in employment Unemployed Change in unemployment, past year % change in unemployment
Greenburgh Town 2009 Apr 5.8% 48,400 - 1,000 -2.0% 3,000 1,300 76.5%
Greenburgh Town 2008 Apr 3.4% 49,400 400 0.8% 1,700 300 21.4%
Greenburgh Town 2007 Apr 2.8% 49,000 600 1.2% 1,400 - 300 -17.6%
Greenburgh Town 2006 Apr 3.4% 48,400 300 0.6% 1,700 100 6.3%
Greenburgh Town 2005 Apr 3.2% 48,100 600 1.3% 1,600 - 300 -15.8%
Greenburgh Town 2004 Apr 3.8% 47,500 300 0.6% 1,900 100 5.6%
Greenburgh Town 2003 Apr 3.8% 47,200 500 1.1% 1,800 - 200 -10.0%
Greenburgh Town 2002 Apr 4.1% 46,700 - 200 -0.4% 2,000 700 53.8%
Greenburgh Town 2001 Apr 2.8% 46,900 600 1.3% 1,300 - 100 -7.1%
Greenburgh Town 2000 Apr 2.8% 46,300 1,400


Records 1-10 of 10

Search again

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

What is the source of this informatio? It is obviously flawed.

Paul Feiner said...

This was from the Journal News.

Peter Zenger said...

This is meaningless - statistical measures are useful only if you know what you are measuring and the validity of your tools - you have offered neither - merely a cut-and-paste job you think shows you are doing a good job. Look again, it shows how very poorly we, as a community, are doing. It has nothing to do with the quality or ability of our erstwhile leaders.

Anonymous said...

Thanks you for your response Mr. Feiner. Once again you show all of the people of the Town of Greenburgh that you really don't know much about or care for the Town. That you cut and paste as poster Peter Zengler notes is not acceptable. How many people live in the Town of Greenburgh? It's not the 48,400 that are cited. Check out the published census data.

Aren't you pretending to be the Supervisor of the Town?

Both you and The Journal News show that when it comes to getting the facts right, you both have a long way to go.

Anonymous 5/22/09 1:22PM

Anonymous said...

The information posted was informative. Disagree with Peter.

Anonymous said...

Peter: Can you do better?

Peter Zenger said...

Dear 8:09 -
I'm not unhappy you disagree with me - please tell me what the information means. From the presentation in this blog I cannot understand what, if anything, I'm being told. Because I can't determine what I'm being told, I cannot infer why I'm being told...
Clarity in communication should be a priority.